andrewkiss
READ THE MARKHAM BIKE PARK THREAD

Note Board

Jonnyt wrote
July 27, 2008 at 10:04
Yo i got my bike lets ride soon

kyle7 wrote
July 26, 2008 at 9:38
you selling your p2?

creamsoda89 wrote
June 24, 2008 at 16:44
buy&sell, bud.

jezzah wrote
April 17, 2008 at 5:16
Dumbest brits of my age? What the f*ck are you on about

jezzah wrote
April 16, 2008 at 23:24
Either way. Your still retarded little canadian gayboy, though im sure your used to be called that now.

jezzah wrote
April 16, 2008 at 14:19
Well your obviously retarded then dipshit.

jezzah wrote
April 16, 2008 at 12:39
Are you technically retarded? the clouds are shopped yes, though the rider certainly isnt, why would it be!?

jezzah wrote
April 16, 2008 at 12:06
Sepi didnt photoshop it, hes too shit with photoshop to be able to ever to something like that!

sepi wrote
April 14, 2008 at 12:50
Composition? Effect? Thats what makes a photo, its not as if someone bodged it in paint. Its not a moose gapping 5000feet, its lighting + background work, most of it probably done with ISO settings on the Camera. It is far from 'healthy sceptisim' Its insulting to the rider and photographer, the guys busting out tricks on a dirt line.

demo4life wrote
April 14, 2008 at 12:47
no prob

sepi wrote
April 14, 2008 at 12:44
I'm sorry but that such a stupid comment. Firstly, its my POD, i know the rider, i know the location and i know the rules and running of the website. The rider/trick/air is not changed, the composition and background is edited for effect, as with 99.999% of all photos you will see in magazines and such, who said its about pure riding skill? PHOTO of the day. When you can take good shots and actually understand photography without making childish comments i'll have a decent discussion but right now its just insulting to the rider and photographer.

demo4life wrote
April 14, 2008 at 12:39
intergaltic planetary by the beastie boyz

sepi wrote
April 14, 2008 at 12:32
Buddy, whats the deal? theres no rule against artistically photoshopped pics?